Bp oil spill Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Can God and Real Evil Be Reconciled

Can God and Real Evil Be Reconciled The fight between the great and fiendishness has constantly intrigued people’s minds. A large number of books were composed on the conflict of the two powers, a huge number of motion pictures were shot to unveil the scale and the glory of this battle. Truth be told, numerous religions incorporate a portrayal of unquestionably the great and irrefutably the wickedness, the previous being commonly alluded to as God, while the last having incalculable number of names: fiend, Satan, Beelzebub, Baal, thus on.Advertising We will compose a custom exposition test on Can God and Real Evil Be Reconciled? explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More On the one hand, the last appears to be a finished cursed thing and, in this manner, doesn't merit the option to exist, which is stressed particularly emphatically in Christianity. The shrewd grasps an assortment of thoughts and ideas, yet it is constantly considered as something to dispose of for the last time. Harming and annihilat ing abhorrence, notwithstanding, doesn't appear to follow the fundamental standards of Christianity, which is established on the idea of affection and absolution. Along these lines, there is just a single method to deal with the idea of malice, which is to grasp it. In spite of the way that God and the Evil are generally contradicted in Christianity, the main conceivable method of taking care of the underhandedness ought to be seen through the compromise of the two, since the previous, as the alpha and omega of the universe, produced the making of the last mentioned and is, truth be told, identified with it. While the presence of the fiendishness is affirmed by the Bible, one may in any case discover it very disputable that God, who, as indicated by the Bible, speaks to the most simply, the most idealistic and the kindest element really takes into consideration the abhorrence to exist. The general thought of God taking into account abhorrent sounds sufficiently strange. For sure, as per the fundamental Biblical premises, God rebuffs miscreants, i.e., the individuals who do detestable things. In any case, it is as yet unquestionable that malice is a fundamental piece of the universe, which picks the inquiry whether the two should fight with one another or to accommodate. There are a few responses to this inquiry. As indicated by one speculation, the way that the insidiousness and God exist together can be clarified by the way that there must be elements between the great and wickedness; in any case, the world as we probably am aware it would have stopped to exist. As Jacobs clarifies, a large portion of the false impressions concerning the birthplace of the malevolence and the connection among God and the Evil originate from the absence of comprehension of the genuine significance of Good and Evil (Jacobs, 2003, 311). Another complaint against the way that God has command over the malevolent concerns the nonappearance of any activities against the shrewdness from God. There is no record of any battle among God and Satan in the Bible, there is no referencing of any wonder occurring so as to forestall the verifiable scalawags, various slaughters, destructions and different ghastly violations against mankind have been submitted regardless of the way that God Almighty looks out for humankind, as indicated by what Christians say.Advertising Looking for exposition on theory? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More To illuminate the given clash between the Biblical standards and the truth it will be required to investigate the particulars of the Christian religion somewhat closer. Among the responses to the given issue, Augustine’s Solution is referenced frequently. As per Augustine of Hippo, shrewdness couldn't emerge out of God †rather, it needed to exist as a different substance. Augustine contends that the decency is the normal condition of people and that underhandedness is u nfamiliar to the regular reality: â€Å"Evil is in opposition to nature; truth be told, it can just mischief to nature; and it would not be a shortcoming to pull back from God were it not that it is progressively normal to follow him. It is that reality which makes a withdrawal a deficiency. That is the reason the decision of insidiousness is a noteworthy confirmation that the nature is good† (11.17). (Schuler, 2008, 33) Therefore, as indicated by Schuler, Augustine’s contention is consummately practical. As Schuler clarified, â€Å"Thus, fiendishness can be distinguished as that which neutralizes the common tendencies of people, and for Augustine, with respect to all Christians, people were made to be normally pulled in to God† (Schuler, 2008, 33). Really, the given contention has the right to be referenced as an undeniable idea of good and abhorrence in the Christian religion. Then again, it ought to likewise be remembered that, as per the Christian religion, Lucifer, who basically is simply the malice, is a fallen holy messenger, i.e., a has-been component of the Heaven and, thusly, the great (Scudder, 2001). As the ongoing theosophical examines state, the birthplace of Satan gives a ton of nourishment for contemplations and, along these lines, questions the root of fiendishness, permitting to propose that the abhorrence was generated from the decency. Despite the fact that the proof concerning the starting point of the insidiousness when all is said in done and the Satan specifically is fairly ambiguous, it is as yet worth referencing that in many sources that can be characterized as dependable, Satan is referenced as a has-been holy messenger, i.e., a previous inhabitant of paradise, who chose to utilize his craftiness to oppose the Lord. There are numerous understandings of the given story; to the extent the customary Biblical translation goes, there is no accurate articulation concerning the Satan being a previous blessed messenger, yet the accompanying line can be deciphered as the evidence that the Satan used to dwell in paradise once (as per the King James adaptation of the Bible): â€Å"How craftsmanship thou tumbled from paradise, O Lucifer, child of the morning! how craftsmanship thou chop to the cold earth, which didst debilitate the nations!† (Isaiah 14:12). The way that the Lucifer was alluded to as the â€Å"son of the morning,† just as the referencing of his fall, demonstrates the possibility that he used to have a place in Heaven. Thusly, it tends to be expected that the Evil was brought forth from goodness and temperance; consistently, these two must share something for all intents and purpose †and, truth be told, they do. Both speak to the most distant boundaries, both have little to do with anything identified with the human world because of their craziness, and both are mysteriously interwoven in each and every person.Advertising We will compose a custom paper test on Can God and Real Evil Be Reconciled? explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More Hence, it will be sensible to expect that, when interwoven, the two neither conflict, nor destroy; rather, they speak to an individual, with his/her flaws, resources and good standards. In this manner, the great and the shrewdness can't be considered totally incongruent; in actuality, they blend into an unconventional merge of transgression and excellence. Consequently, malice ought not be battled against until it at long last disappears suddenly and completely, for it is a totally out of reach objective; rather, the great and the wickedness ought to be reconciled. Hence, conceding the presence of underhanded, one will unavoidably pose oneself an inquiry concerning what the insidiousness is required for. There are numerous methods of deciding the job of the abhorrence. From Jacobs’ perspective, the two essential jobs that the malicious plays in the Biblical stories are 1) the idea that fill s in as the foil for the Goodness to advance; 2) the idea that causes one characterize the line between the good and the indecent. Without the insidious as a component of the human world, it is difficult to make sense of what is acceptable and what is terrible. The malevolent fills in as a kind of perspective point for individuals to adhere to a meaningful boundary between the good and the improper, in this way, getting ready to transform into idealistic adherents (Pachuau, 2007). Without the shrewd, one would not have the option to characterize the idea of good activities and highminded conduct. Accordingly, detestable activities would be completed in the end. The underhandedness can be viewed as a component that the world needs to have as a marker for the region that must not be trodden (Browning Reed, 2004). Regardless of whether there was no underhanded on the planet, individuals would have in the long run found it, for the mankind has to know where the limits between what is pe rmitted and what is precluded lie. It would not be right to expect that, because of the connection among God and malice, the previous has a detestable component also. Rather, the two ought to be seen as two inverse substances, one of which originates from another. Rather, it ought to be expected that the abhorrence must exist together with the great, since without the previous, the last can't be characterized. While outright righteousness is viewed as a definitive objective of the Christianity, it is important to concede that the given objective is not really achievable, which implies that the mankind needs both the possibility of the great and the possibility of the shrewdness so as to characterize the essential standards of profound quality and prudence to follow. Reference List Browning, R. L. Reed, R. A. (2004). Absolution, compromise and good boldness: Motives and structures for Ministry in a disturbed world. Excellent Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.Advertising Searching for paper on reasoning? We should check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Find out More Jacobs, M. R. (2003). The applied elements of good and abhorrence in the Joseph story: An interpretative and hermeneutical request. Diary of the Study of the Old Testament, 27, 309â€338. Pachuau, M. (2007). Development of good and shrewdness in Iris Murdoch’s talk. New Delhi, IN: Sales Office. Schuler, S. J. (2008). Augustinian Auden: The impact of Augustine of Hippo on W. H. Auden. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest. Scudder, P. (2001). How Jesus accommodated humanity to God. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.

Can I Get Addicted to Xanax Even If It Was Prescribed

Can I Get Addicted to Xanax Even If It Was Prescribed Addiction Drug Use Prescription Medications Print Can I Get Addicted to Xanax? By Elizabeth Hartney, BSc., MSc., MA, PhD Elizabeth Hartney, BSc, MSc, MA, PhD is a psychologist, professor, and Director of the Centre for Health Leadership and Research at Royal Roads University, Canada. Learn about our editorial policy Elizabeth Hartney, BSc., MSc., MA, PhD Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on April 03, 2017 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on April 28, 2019 Russell Johnson / EyeEm / Getty Images More in Addiction Drug Use Prescription Medications Cocaine Heroin Marijuana Meth Ecstasy/MDMA Hallucinogens Opioids Alcohol Use Addictive Behaviors Nicotine Use Coping and Recovery Xanax is a prescription medication  that  is sometimes prescribed to people with a variety of anxiety disorders, as well as for those who have been through upsetting experiences, such as the death of a loved one, to help calm them down and help them sleep. Even though it is addictive, people still often ask the question, Will I get addicted to Xanax when it has been prescribed by my physician? Why Would My Doctor Prescribe a Potentially Addictive Drug? For people who have been through a shocking and  distressing experience, the feelings of anxiety they are experiencing are normal under the circumstances. Insomnia is also common. Although incidents such as the unexpected death of a loved one are very upsetting, grief is a natural human process that takes time to overcome.  The distressing feelings do get better, but it is often difficult to predict how long it will take someone to deal with a stressor, such as an unexpected loss, emotionally. In these circumstances, it is understandable that your physician would prescribe you Xanax.  Xanax is a benzodiazepine medication  that works very quickly and effectively to reduce anxiety and help with sleep. Physicians often prescribe these medications to help patients feel better when they are very distressed, and generally, patients find them helpful in the short term. Xanax can calm people quickly and effectively and can help promote relaxation and sleep when taken as prescribed. For those who only take the dose given by their doctor, and who only take the drug for a brief period until things settle down, these medications can be part of a coping strategy which includes emotional and practical support, as needed. The Risk of Benzodiazepine Addiction However, benzodiazepines do carry some risk of addiction.  Although most who take them never develop issues with addiction or abuse, many people who take them at high enough doses over a long enough period of time do, at the very least, experience a  rebound effect  when they stop taking them. A rebound effect is a more pronounced version of the symptoms you were taking the medication for, so in your case, you are likely to feel an increase in anxiety and sleeplessness. Some people develop a more severe addiction to benzodiazepines, especially if they take a higher dose than  was originally prescribed. If you ask your physician for a higher dose, he or she may feel it is supportive to prescribe it, even though  the risk that you will become addicted increases. Under the circumstances, your physician may believe the most important thing right now is to help you get through the difficult time. Not everyone who takes benzodiazepines gets addicted or to the same extent.  Although many clinicians believe that addiction is unpredictable, research has shown that there are psychological and situational factors that can affect it. In general, there is a personality profile associated with the tendency to become addicted to benzodiazepines.  Those who become addicted tend to cope in more emotional ways than those who take benzodiazepines but dont become addicted. These people cope in task-based ways instead. Those who become addicted tend to withdraw more from social situations, and they tend to have had more adverse life events. How to Avoid Addiction to Benzodiazepines If you decide to take  prescribed benzodiazepines for your anxiety or sleep problems, it is very important not to take more of the medication than prescribed. It might also be worth talking to your doctor about alternative medications or non-medication approaches to treatment, or contacting a mental health professional to find out what they recommend. For example, there are effective psychotherapies for treating anxiety, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, and  lifestyle changes that will promote improved sleep in the long term. Although it is important to recognize the risk of addiction, it is also important to take care of yourself emotionally. Whatever you and your doctor decide is the right treatment for you, it would help to spend time with a trusted, caring person who will understand and support you during difficult times. If you feel unable to cope with your feelings and feel that there is no-one to turn to, go to your nearest emergency room or call 911. How Long Does Xanax Stay in Your System?

Literary Elements Of Bram Stoker s Dracula - 1994 Words

Vampire stories are full of mystery and suspense and also very interesting, but did you know that the story of Dracula has plenty of literary elements that better help the reader analyze and understand the story better than before. Dracula is a Vampire/Victorian book that expresses a lot of elements for example: symbolism. Literary terms are terms used to discuss, classify, and analyze novels, poetry, and books like Dracula. These terms are the most important aspects in a piece of work. Throughout the book: Dracula many terms are present to discuss or classify the author’s work that will lift the reader knowledge. Literary terms convey the writer’s message in a simple manner to the readers. In Bram Stoker’s Dracula, the use of literary†¦show more content†¦These gothic elements are elements that represent the dark features of the book that are happening to Jonathan and what he is going through. Round characters are throughout the story and all play a significant role during the story. Jonathan, Mina, and Dr.Seward are all round characters that make a significant impact on the story. The round characters play a significant and impactful part, throughout the story. For example, when Mina Harker was in the process of becoming a vampire in Chapter 26 she guides and helps the group consisting of Jonathan, Mina, Seward, Vanhelsing, Arthur, and Quincey Morris track down Dracula so they can have the jump on him. â€Å"All day long we have traveled...† (Stoker 393). This shows that Mina has given them information on Dracula and join them in the journey. They find and kill him to set Mina soul free. Dr. Seward was a Doctor who helped Mina and Lucy to save one of their lives. The quote shows that round characters play a big part in the story. Jonathan develops throughout the story. It proves round’s play a major role throughout the book even though some may not even not ice. But they play a role that can change up the whole story. The round character has to develop like Mina did. Romantic relations/conventions are showed during the duration of the story. There are many things that Jonathan encounters, but he writes in his journal that he was part of some sort of â€Å"queer dream†. Jonathan experiences a queer dream as part of aShow MoreRelatedLiterary Elements Of Bram Stoker s Dracula2026 Words   |  9 Pagesdid you know that the story of Dracula has plenty of literary elements that better help the reader analyze and understand the story better than before. Dracula is a Vampire/Victorian book that expresses a lot of elements for example: symbolism. Literary terms such as gothic and romantics are terms used to discuss, classify, and analyze novels, poetry, and books like Dracula. These terms are the most important aspects in a piece of work. Throughout the book: Dracula many terms are present to discussRead MoreWeaknesses Of Dracula1674 Words   |  7 Pageswho sparkles? Dracula was written in 1897 and is the first piece of literature that includes vampires and sets up the characteristics of future vampires. Dozen of works of literature has been created based off of the creature in Dracula for example the novel Twilight and as time goes on literature has tweaked some of the vampire’s traits, powers and weaknesses. Dracula is a gothic novel with gothic elements such as a decaying setting and supernatural beings or monsters. Bram Stoker is an author fromRead More Intertextual Exchange in Carmilla, Dracula and the Historian1639 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"Writers seldom duplicate their influential precursor(s); rather, they often work within a certain framework established by other writers or generic conventions, but vary aspects of it in significant ways† (Friedman 155). Sheridan Le Fanu’s, Carmilla, Bram Stoker’s, Dracula and Elizabeth Kostova’s, The Historian, clearly engage in this intertextual exchange, as evidenced by their use of narrative structure and striking character parallels. Published in 1872, Le Fanu relates the story of CarmillaRead MoreGothic Elements And Gothic Elements In Bram Stokers Dracula2068 Words   |  9 PagesGothic Elements in Dracula A Gothic novel is one which incorporates all the modes of literature such as horror, the setting, suspense, superstition, atmosphere, horror etc. In the story Dracula the author shows these traits in various sections of the story that makes it a lot more interesting and it is one of the main characteristics beside the various other features that makes this story great. Dracula is a story by Mr. Bram Stoker during the Victorian era where Count Dracula is the antagonistRead MoreGothic Elements In Dracula Essay1499 Words   |  6 PagesBram Stoker s Dracula is a staple of the Gothic Horror genre. It is a novel that has been scrutinized by countless readers since it was published in 1897. While Stoker s novel is certainly not the first example of a piece of gothic horror, or even the first example of a gothic horror story focusing categorically on vampires, it still managed to plenarily capture the attention of the public. But not only did Dracula enthrall the readers of its time, but it perpetuated to be a mainstay of the gothicRead MoreThe Strange Case Of Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde1035 Words   |  5 PagesHyde-ing In Plain Sight: The Duality of Dr. Jekyll Robert Louis Stevenson s initial notoriety came as an avatar of expansive adventure fiction, most famously through 1883 s Treasure Island. Just three years later, however, he would cement his status as one of the 19th century s most popular and versatile writers by releasing the horror suspense novel, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. It s a testament to Stevenson s concept of the duality of man-- the pious intellectual and the wantonRead MoreComparing Bram Stoker’s Dracula and the 1972 Film Blacula Essay1917 Words   |  8 PagesBram Stoker’s Dracula is not only a classic story of men and monsters, but a dramatic reactionary work to the perceived threats to Victorian society in nineteenth century England. In modern times there have been many film adaptations of the novel, each developing a unique analysis or criticism of the literary text within the framework of the society and time period in which it was created. The 1972 film Blacula is one of the most culturally specific variations on the story of Dracula, and highlightsRead MoreEnglish Source Doc.7581 Words   |  31 PagesTitle: Dracula: Stoker s Response to the New Woman Author(s): Carol A. Senf Publication Details: Victorian Studies 26.1 (Autumn 1982): p33-49. Source: Nineteenth-Century Literature Criticism. Ed. Jessica Bomarito and Russel Whitaker. Vol. 156. Detroit: Gale, 2006. From Literature Resource Center. Document Type: Critical essay Full Text: COPYRIGHT 2006 Gale, COPYRIGHT 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning Full Text:   [(essay date autumn 1982) In the following essay, Senf contends that, contraryRead MoreLiterary Origins, Cultural Relevance, And Documentary Techniques2930 Words   |  12 PagesRebecca Holland Visual Anthropology Dracula and Friends - Literary Origins, Cultural Relevance, and Documentary Techniques in the Cinematic Space of the American Vampire Film Beginning with a debut in American cinema in 1927 (1), the vampire has enjoyed a long and illustrious cinematic sojourn that has tracked a number of changes in his or her appearance, demeanor, personality, style of undeath, and relationship to humankind. At first an intimate invader, then a source of terror to be loathedRead MoreGraphic In Comic Books And Graphic Novelsbram1158 Words   |  5 Pages Page:of 10 Graphic BleedVampires in comic books and graphic novelsBram Stoker’s Dracula #1 (1992). Panel art by Mike Mingola.Since the 18th century, Vampires have ultimatelytranscended narrativeboundaries and genre divides. The Vampiresub- ­Ã¢â‚¬ culturehasflourishes in neo gothic aesthetics in science fiction and fantasy,in romantic and young adultliteratureand incelluloid. Vampiregraphic

Essay on Dobbie the Duck - 768 Words

On a farm near the state of Oklahoma, there lived a little duck named Dobbles. Dobbles was the most energetic, loud, and crazy duck on the farm. The pond near the farm was his favorite place to play. He and his friends were always having fun and causing mischief at the pond. It was the perfect place to cool off during the summer. One day when Dobbles went to the pond, none of his friends were there. They met at that pond at the same time everyday, so he was very worried. Dobbles looked everywhere for them. He looked behind their favorite log, near the tallest tree, in the water, and in the grass, but he couldn’t find them anywhere. He kept shouting, â€Å"Daffy, Donald, Daisy! Is anyone out there?† There was no reply, and Dobbles became very†¦show more content†¦I don’t know what you are talking about.† â€Å"Mother Hen found an even bigger pond up north. It has a huge apple tree and so many cool places to play hide-and-seek! The plan was to go there today instead of this pond. I had to talk to Mother Hen, so I told Donald to tell you.† â€Å"That’s weird. Donald never told me anything.† â€Å"That is really weird. He usually never forgets these things. Let’s go to the pond to ask him. Also, we need to let everyone know you’re safe.† They went to the other pond, told everyone the news, and tried to find Donald. Donald was by a big tree playing with Huey, Dewey, and Louie on a swing that tied to a branch of the tree at the top. â€Å"Hey Dobbles! Where were you? We were looking for you, but you never showed up,† said Donald. â€Å"Dob bles said that you never told him about the pond,† said Daisy. â€Å"I was busy cleaning the barn last night, so I told Daffy to tell you,† replied Donald. Dobbles, Daisy, and Donald knew that Daffy was sometimes irresponsible, so they decided to go talk to him and figure out what happened. â€Å"Hey Daffy, did you remember to tell Dobbles about coming to the pond today?† asked Donald. â€Å"I was trying to find something to eat with Dewey last night, so I asked Huey to tell him,† Daffy replied. â€Å"Here we go again,† said Dobbles. They all went to find Huey. â€Å"Hey Guys! What’s up?† greeted Huey. â€Å"Did you remember to tell Dobbles about going to the pond

Childhood affected poems Essay Example For Students

Childhood affected poems Essay This makes you automatically judge what the poem will be like. In Duffys poem she uses alliteration to describe nicer things,  sweet shop  When you hear this you feel happier and think of nicer things.  In Heaneys poem he describes things that arent really a nice image,  jampotfuls and jellied  These dont sound as nice or give you as nice of an image as sweet shop does.  In the third stanza of Duffys poem it makes you feel sort of relieved,  freed and followed. This reminds you more of being a child. The word freed makes u feel a lot less trapped and feel more comfortable.  In stanza 2 of Heaneys poem he uses,  coarse croaking.  This seems more threatening as it gives you the image of being surrounded by frogs. Both these poems mention croaking in them.  At the end of Duffys poem it starts to get more negative,  tasted and tangible.  The word tangible makes you feels uncomfortable. The last piece of alliteration is,  sky and split. This isnt a positive thought therefore both poems end negatively.  Both poems use a range of similes. In Duffys poem she uses a simile in a more positive way,  The classroom glowed like a sweet shop.  This is a nice colourful image; also as well as being a simile this quote also has alliteration which has worked well. However in Heaneys poem the use of simile in negative,  their loose necks pulsed like sails.  This isnt a nice image and is more a threatening thought. It makes us understand more clearly the thoughts of each writer and how their childhood affected their poems. Another simile used in Heaneys poem is just as negative, poised like mud grenades . This makes it sound more dangerous as grenades are life threatening. There is also a negative simile used in Duffys poem,  Brady and Hindley faded, like the faint, uneasy smudge of mistake.  This quote begins to even out the negativeness used in the poems. Although there are more similes used in Heaneys poem,  frogspawn that grew like clotted water.  The word clotted makes it sound more dangerous.  Heaney also uses metaphor in his poem, again in a more negative way,  Daily it sweltered in the punishing sun. This makes you think of pain and sort of feel sympathy for the person because its like hes being punished. Duffys poem uses metaphor in a negative way at the end of her poem,  The air tasted of electricity  In a way this sort of reminds me of pain as well, like an electric shock. Heaney makes you feel uncomfortable,  The air was thick  This is more a feeling of being claustrophobic which is very intimidating and makes you feel a bit sick. He also mentions angry frogs which makes you feel worried as the frogs could attack at any moment. Heaney uses metaphor throughout his poem and Duffy only uses it at the end of her poem. I found the personification in each poem very interesting, especially in Duffys poem,  The laugh of a bell.  I found this an amazing way to describe something and it makes me feel full of joy. Surprisingly I found that at the start of Heaneys poem he uses some positive personification,  heart of the townland  This sounds happy and makes it out to be a nice place so you dont really expect the rest of the poem to sound so negative.  I found the personification in Duffys poem better as it used more throughout her poem,  A xylophones nonsense heard from another form.  This reminds me a lot of my childhood especially the way she mentioned nonsense. I found one piece of personification shocking coming from a child but it shows she is getting older,  Heavy sexy sky.  I wouldnt expect a younger person to use the term sexy to describe something.  Neither poems rhymed which I found disappointing. I think they would be more enjoyable to read if there was rhythm. In Duffys poem where she used the word chanted I think she could have made it better by making the countries rhyme.  Heaneys poem has used Onomatopoeia in a funny but disturbing way,  The slap and plop. .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81 , .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81 .postImageUrl , .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81 , .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81:hover , .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81:visited , .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81:active { border:0!important; } .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81:active , .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81 .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u8dd684bdb6f5977bef497b31a64c9f81:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Who Has Seen the Wind: Brian's Apprehension of Life EssayDuffy uses onomatopoeia in a completely different way which makes you feel calm and relaxed,  Mrs Tilcher chanted the scenery.  There is not really any repetition of words in either of the poems which I think makes them less threatening.  After reading both poems I can feel empathy for both poets. In Heaneys poem it made me remember when I went out and collected frogspawn, but I never found it scary or threatening like his poem makes it sound. Therefore I would prefer Duffys poem. In her poem everything said in it happened to me during my childhood in school. Reading Duffys poem made me think back to me sitting in class in a brightly coloured classroom. Although I was disappointed that it didnt rhyme at all because it would have made me enjoy it even more.

Why Did Stalin Succeed Lenin and not Trotsky Essay Example

Why Did Stalin Succeed Lenin and not Trotsky Essay After Lenins death Russia looked for a new leader. The two favourites were about to embark on a political campaign; trying to eliminate each other out of the running with their popularity, ideas for the future dedication. Some say however, it was Stalins ability to manipulate the people around him, using them to higher his popularity and to aid his lack of political knowledge. Trotsky had a number of titles and past successes; he was the leader of the red army and played a crucial role in the 1917 revolution. But Stalin was underestimated; he used his position effectively to throw Trotsky out of the party.As a youth Stalin was a troublesome child. Before he was fifteen, he was kicked out of seminary school for committing crimes; he then moved on to a young adulthood of terrorism, and had numerous run-ins with the Tsarist police force along the way. He was exiled to Siberia and was imprisoned for his rebellious behaviour. He already had the making of a great leader; dedicated and brav e. However, he was claimed to be a poor decision maker, lacked the capacity to produce an inspirational speech and his political knowledge was rudimentary to say the least. Walter Laqueur wrote:He certainly did not obtain his leadership on his outstanding moral qualities; on the contrary, there was in him a strong streak of both criminality and madness that became more pronounced with age.He also writes:Stalin was in no way designed to be an idol of the masses: He was neither a demonic, hypnotic figure like Hitler or Mussolini, who could impart emotions to millions, nor a Pied Piper, seductive in leadership. Unlike Lenin, he could not impose his authority naturally on his peers. He was no intellectual; Trotsky, Bukharin, and many others were superior to him in this respect.This basically states that Stalins leadership qualities were not competing with the qualities the other leaders had to offer, in this case, Trotsky.Stalin was far from decisive. He took time and thought his action s through, sometimes he took too long. He seemed incapable of making speedy decisions. He was neither a thinker nor solver, he was unable to come up with new idea or concepts, and pioneer is usually not a word associated with Stalin. Stalin would adopt other peoples idea and put them forward as his own. As a member of Ex.Com, a colleague said Stalin was aa grey blur which flickered obscurely and left no trace, this backs up my statement, saying he was insignificant yet manipulative at the same time.Stalin worked his way up, befriending Lenin during the civil war. Stalin published theses by Lenin, but altered them to make them softer opposed to aggressive, which was more consistent with the party line.After this, Stalin became more involved in the party and he was later appointed to General Secretary of Food Supplies. In this role he did very well, and as time went on his duties became more complex. This was due to him self; he wrote this to Lenin in relation to the White and Cossack advance to Tsaritsyn, somebody (or me) [be given] special authority in military matters to take urgent measures in South Russia before it is too late. His ambition to get to the top is evident in this statement. It shows he was not satisfied with his role at that moment, and urged for more work.Lenin became ill; he suffered a series of strokes which left him almost completely incapacitated as the leader of the Soviet Federation. A number of members took his place, however, Lenin carried on leading the party.Stalin was elected to take care of Lenin, and with Stalins future in Lenins hands, he was going to keep a good eye on him. It seems as though Stalin wanted Lenin out of the party, keep him away from political work as much as possible. One example when Stalin found out Lenin was engaged in political relations, he went in to a fit of rage over the phone to Lenins wife for allowing a letter to be sent to Trotsky. Reportedly he called her such things as a syphilitic whore. It was qu ite evident that Stalin badly wanted to lead Russia, and the pressure of his self-motivation was causing him to lose all control over his actions. Lenin found out; he began to produce speeches and letters in order to crush Stalin politically. However, the very next day Lenin died, leaving the door open to the leader of the party to Stalin and Trotsky.Stalin used his role as the carer of Lenin effectively. He published pictures of him and Lenin smiling, as if to say they were good friends. Some were counterfeit; a happy Lenin would be pasted on to a picture of Stalin. This is the length Stalin would go to in able become leader. This is an example of his manipulative skills; he used Lenin as his advantage.Resultantly to this Stalin became General Secretary of the party. In this role, Stalin basically controlled the appointing of people. There were four real contenders for the leader of the Party. Trotsky seemed to be the favourite, with past successes on his side, he could organize, t alk and lead just as he did when he organized and created the red guards to invade Petrograd in the October revolution and he also lead the Red Army to victory during the civil war in an inspiration battle. On the other hand, he was believed not to be loyal; he joined the Bolsheviks and turned his back on the Mensheviks. He was a military man, and some feared he would become a vicious dictator trying to conquer Europe. The also feared Mother Russia would become neglected under him due to his ambition to spread communism and this was one of his main aims. He never depended on people and found it hard to make friends; therefore he was unpopular amongst the party members.Zinoviev and Kamenev were determined to stop Trotsky becoming leader, they were left-wingers.Stalin appointed people in the party who were loyal to him to senior party positions. This meant Stalins rivals had no support in the party.Stalin needed more than this to make sure he would become leader. He used Zinoviev and Kamenev to attack Trotsky in numbers and so eventually Trotsky was dismissed as Commissar for War. Trotsky had no support at all at this point, and so was voted out by the members loyal to Stalin. His views clashed with the Partys new policy, communism in one country.After that Stalin again appointed people who were loyal to him. Due to this, Zinoviev and Kamenev were dismissed. They believed in fast economic modernisation but the majority of the Politburo believed in the New Economic Policy, a gradual reform of the economy.With the entire contenders kicked out, Stalin was now in complete control and without a single election.Stalins ambition in the end prevailed. He worked his way up, and his positions in the party given to him, he used effectively. Trotsky lacked people support, and came across as an unpopular outcast. Stalin was patient in his actions, when he was General Secretary he simple waited and waited until he had the full support of the party. He was a pure opportunist.T rotsky thought his ideas how to run the country were going to drag him to victory, that wasnt that case, a lot more was required, and Stalin acquired it.